tribune news service
New Delhi, January 3
Disagreeing with the majority verdict, Justice BV Nagarathna said the minister’s disparaging remarks, if made in his official capacity, could be attributed to the government by proxy.
She said deviant remarks made by a minister can only be treated as his personal remarks if they are not consistent with the government’s position. said that it could be done by forming a code of conduct.
Noting that freedom of speech and expression is a necessary right to ensure a healthy democracy, Justice Nagalatna also expressed concern over hate speech, which he said “has damaged the fundamental values of the Constitution.” rice field. “Hate speech attacks fundamental constitutional values by marking society as unequal. from diverse backgrounds. The prerequisite for a cohesive society is based on pluralism and multiculturalism like India, ‘Bharat’. Fraternity is based on the idea that citizens are responsible to each other,” she said.
She said that indiscreet speech has been a source of concern recently as it is hurtful and demeaning. Civil servants and other influential figures, including celebrities, are obliged to take more responsibility and hold back, Judge Nagalatna said. “They need to understand and measure their words with regard to the possible consequences for public sentiment and behavior, and also be aware that they are setting an example for their fellow citizens to follow. there is.
